The best solution is “go to
the
mattresses”. Start a dialogue with the insurance company
Director
of Medicare and Medicaid to begin a discussion regarding what is medically
necessary. This is a dialogue I initiated with an insurance company
this
January regarding a specific case. It also helps to get your
local At the time, I believe one company
was
being authorized for payment otherwise the rest were considered “out
of network”.
Once I was done with a 3 week dialogue regarding a specific case, I was
able to
offer contact information for the funding coordinators of all the AAC
companies to the insurance company and the funding coordinators a
connection to
establish “in network status”. There are still a few
kinks
being worked out however now I have an insurance company who provided cost
plan
Medicare replacement policy processing paperwork when it was denying for
the
reason of being “out of the network”. The great reward
for
funding coordinators is that they now have one person to contact for device
submission questions. As a therapist, what I found
most
frustrating about the process was the lack of education individuals
reviewing
the submission knew about the federal guidelines for AAC, who was the
specialist to recommend this technology, even an understanding of the
evaluation process, and how it is processed (not through the
physician’s
office—oh boy.). It allowed me to offer education about the Medicare
and
MA guidelines to clarify questions the reviewers have. I also gained
the
perspective into the reviewers world. They really don’t get
much
training and even their managers are not fully aware of the guidelines
either. One way to begin the dialogue is to
develop an understanding of how the insurance company decided to accept
certain
manufacturers as “in network providers or preferred providers”.
If
the insurance company is representing Medicare or MA, Medicare and MA do
not
have a regulation allowing an insurance company to establish “in
network providers”.
Medicare and MA have established contracts with AAC companies that accept
their
assignment. Insurance companies representing Medicare and MA must
follow
the same guidelines and authorize payment for communication devices.
Through
this dialogue I found out how different a Insurance cost plan that is
a Medicare
Replacement plan is, how the funding departments are required process it
differently, how to jointly work with an insurance representative, and how
the
insurance company can change their process to improve the processing of
this
paperwork. As a result of this dialogue, this company is even
covering
the co-payment when it is the secondary insurance (which it denied payment
for
years!). This was a small victory I wanted to
share. It is not an entirely rosie world in
MN. We still have other insurance companies misbehaving (e.g.
establishing “in-network providers”—BCBS). It is
slowly improving as I learn
to
work within the insurance network to overturn the nonsensical ideology now
a
policy. I lean on other organizations to fight the battles I do
not
have the time nor resources (e.g. Ann
Hoffmann| ALS Association MN
Chapter, Coordinator for the Hrbek-Sing Communication and Assistive Device
Program | PH: 763-520-0445
| Fax: 763-520-0355| From:
I don’t understand how the
insurance
companies are getting away with this. It is one thing to have
“in-network” vendors, but it is another thing to have
in-network
products! Is this not violating some sort of insurance rules?
Can
they say – you HAVE to get a Buick, and a Antoinette Verdone, MSBME,
ATP Assistive Technology
Specialist The ALS Association, Greater
NEW
ADDRESS: 42 Broadway,
Phone: 212-720-3054 Fax: 212-619-7409 Email: xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx "One cannot consent to creep when
one
has the impulse to soar" -- Helen
Keller From:
Hi all, Since we have started a dialog on funding, I wanted to ask for
feedback
on another problematic problem. We have had several incidents on a insurance company--primarily
Blue Cross,
giving our SLP's a difficult time on funding specific devices. For
example, a SLP may write a report for a My Tobii system and the Blues will
call
us and say for example, "ATI is not part of our network, but
"X" company is and I have already checked with the family and
they
say it is okay to change out the device for one that is covered in our
network". This has happened at least three times to us and now
yesterday, I heard from an SLP in Is this happening to others? I want to try to keep track of
this
issue so I appreciate any feedback. Insurance companies are bypassing
therapists and doctors and making decisions based on in-network vendors,
not
what is appropriate for our PALS. Thanks, Alisa Alisa Brownlee,
ATP Assistive
Technology
Consultant, ALS Association, National
Office
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ |