I have some experience with ultravoice but with people
who
have had laryngectomies. One noted problem is volume. I have had 3 people
use
them and stopped because it was not loud enough. The other thing is they
have
to be able to turn the device on via switch. Also contrary to it being a
“natural
voice” it is basically an intra oral electrolarynx which also turned
off
my patients due to the sound. My thought would be an in line passy muir valve trial
first
and than electronic communication device such as you mentioned. If the
eyemax
did not work possibly an inferred/reflective control such as tracker pro
(http://www.madentec.com/products/tracker-pro.php.
Or (http://www.orin.com/access/headmouse/.) Just my thoughts Ron
Hankins
Speech
Language Pathologist Neuroscience
Clinics (602)
839-4150 xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Confidentiality
Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is
addressed
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged
or
otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient,
please (i) do not read, copy or use this communication, or disclose it to
others, (ii) notify the sender immediately by replying to the message, and
(iii) delete the e-mail from your system. Thank
you. From:
xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edward Hitchcock I
got a phone call from an ALS client who was recently trached. For
reasons
I am not certain about, an eyemax trial failed and the family is interested
in
pursuing ultravoice, which I have no experience
with… http://www.ultravoice.com/professionals.htm
While
they cite that it works with ALS, I am concerned longer term about the
following statement about a vent dependent client they tried it
with “Except
for
the facial weakness, his speech musculature was
intact.” Since presumably this person already
has
or will develop dysarthria I am concerned about
that. But does anyone have direct
experience
with this for ALS that can share? Thanks,
Ed Ed Hitchcock
OT/L Rehabilitation Institute of Confidentiality Notice: This message and any
attachments
are only for the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential,
privileged
and/or protected health information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, please: 1) be advised that unauthorized review,
use,
copying, disclosure, or distribution is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful; 2) notify the sender of the delivery by reply e-mail or contact
RIC's
Privacy Officer at 312.238.0766 or xxxxxx@xxxxxxx; and 3) delete
and
destroy all copies of the message and its attachments. Thank
you. |