I agree with the points raised by Margaret and others.
We have all had situations where the patient didn't have private or
Medicare Ins coverage and have found ways to provide a loaner or used
laptops i Phones with software, etc. To be able to do this assumes a fairly
high level of tech-savey by the clinician and/or the patient. Additionally,
it requires more clinician time--the majority of which is not reimbursed.
As Margaret suggests SGD manufacturers costs (which translate into SGD
price points) come from many things not the least of which is providing
technical support and training to patients AND the clinicians who serve
these patients. Without this type of support many clinicians would NOT be
willing to see patients who need SGDS. OK off my soap box now.
Pamela Mathy, PhD, CCC-SLP Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore, MD Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "Margaret Cotts" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:37:52 -0700 To: <xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [Assistive Technology] NYTimes.com: For Speech-Impaired, Insurance Fights Remedy Hi Amy- Thanks for posting this- very
interesting… Parts of the article made me nervous, though… I
don’t think it explored some of the downsides of having insurance
purchase iPhones and Netbooks… - What happens when a person loses the ability to type/use
their fingers? Does Medicare buy them another device? - I think it makes too light of the importance of tech
support… - What happens when a person is ready for their second device,
but can’t get it because they are in hospice? Margaret Cotts From:
xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amy
Roman
|