Hi Alisa-

 

One more thing-

 

In terms of the appeal, if Medicare is saying that it is not medically necessary, then the appeal should be crafted to show why it is medically necessary.  Even though Medicare is saying that the person can keep repeating themselves, the reality is I’m sure we have all seen clients who just gave up on speaking because it was too tiring, or because they had to keep repeating themselves.  I’ve seen many clients who, if they weren’t understood the first time, would just say “forget it”.   For most clients, it’s just not functional to repeat 1/3 of what they say.

 

I think it’s also important to demonstrate how the person’s speech is not functional in certain situations (i.e. over the phone, with certain caregivers, at night, in the car, etc.)

 

I think it’s also important to look at medical necessity in terms of rate of progression.  If a person has a certain speech rate, we know that the machine is going to be needed by the time that they receive it. (Although, at 70% intelligibility, it sounds like the person probably needs it now.)

 

Margaret Cotts

 

 

From: xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alisa Brownlee
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:47 PM
To: AT National Listserv
Subject: [Assistive Technology] AAC funding info for the group

 

Hi everyone,

 

I am asking for feeback on the following information that I was given from a funding coordinator at Dynavox today.  I have her permission to ask the group for their reactions and to see if this is happening with some of your submissions for SGD funding. 

 

Problem is with Medicare and not funding a device based on a client's intelligibility.  Upon correspondence with this funding person, she informed me of a recent denial from Medicare that I have attached.  (SLP documented that the person with ALS had a 70% intelligibility)  The denial letter indicates that since this person can still make themselves verbally understood, they don't qualify for an SGD. 

 

Anyone have denials like this??? 

 

I am not sure what type of wording we need to use now because if CMS is considering the fact that someone can still make themselves verbally understood, regardless of fatigue or dysarthria, then when is someone to use an SGD?? When they have no vocalizations at all??

 

Feedback appreciated....

 

Thanks,

Alisa

 

 

 

Alisa Brownlee, ATP
Clinical Manager, Assistive Technology Services
ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease) Association, Greater Philadelphia Chapter

 

Assistive Technology Consultant, ALS Association, National Office


Direct Phone Number: 215-631-1877